Close this search box.

Breakdowns to Breakthroughs #1

A Series of Reflections on the Way to Wellville

Periodically we’ll poke our heads out to offer our perspective on what’s happening in Wellville – what’s working, what isn’t and what’s in between. As our involvements deepen in our communities so does our understanding of the complexity of the work that lies ahead. Writing about it helps us see it more clearly, and if others benefit from these dispatches, so much the better.

While we’re seeing some successes, what we’re mostly seeing are the breakdowns that seem inevitable when groups of people come together to do work worth caring about. And while the word breakdown can have less-than-positive connotations, we’re using it to point to the necessary precondition of a breakthrough.

Lest it seem we’re pointing a finger at our communities, a short recounting of a couple of breakdowns the national Wellville team’s worked through. First, and almost two years into the journey, we came to the difficult decision to end our working relationship with one of the original Wellville communities: Niagara Falls, NY. They are doing important work and we wish them well, but the direction they’re taking (focused on the built environment) isn’t quite in sync with ours.

This decision compelled us to sharpen our understanding of what we’re doing and why, and also freed up valuable resources with which we’ve been able to entertain possibilities for a new community where our work is a better fit. (More on the results of this exploration in a future update.)

And second, originally we had ambitious expectations for how long it would take for our communities to achieve positive health outcomes. So in recognition of the complexity and extent of the work they’re undertaking, we’ve extended the term of our engagement from five to ten years. If we succeed by the end of our allotted 10 years, we may disband, or we may turn into an advocacy organization.

Share this article:

See More Articles

The Wellville Quadrant Chart: Looking Far and Looking Wide

At Wellville, we use our basic quadrant chart not so much to describe ourselves, but to explore the mindset shift we want to foster.   Our two axes are “short-term thinking” vs. “long-term thinking,” and “benefits just me” vs. “benefits all,” otherwise called “self-interest” vs. “shared interest.”

Spartanburg City Council acknowledges, apologizes for systemic racism

Last Monday the Spartanburg City Council approved unanimously a “Healing, Reconciling and Unity” resolution, acknowledging “the historical antecedents of systemic racism” and apologizing to residents for “racial injustices and long-lasting inequities that have resulted from those policies.” The unprecedented resolution also enumerates specific actions Council members will take, including to “promote racial equity through all policies approved by City Council” and “support community efforts to amplify concerns about racist policies and practices.”

Anti-Discrimination Law Passes Thanks to Hartford Students

The Hartford City Council passed the CROWN Act, which prohibits the denial of employment and educational opportunities because of hair texture or protective hairstyles including braids, locks, twists or bantu knots. The bill was introduced to the Council by students in Advocacy to Legacy, a nonprofit organization that teaches individuals and communities how to advocate for themselves.

Close the gap: Racial equity is fundamental to our health

There is so much in our hearts and minds following these tumultuous past few months and intense past few days. This is a moment to consider the causes of the consequences that are now on full display. It’s time to call out what led to such health disparities and what will it take to improve outcomes for all.

All Hands on Deck

When Covid-19 hit the US, we asked ourselves: Now that everyone is just trying to stay alive and save jobs, is Wellville just a distraction? We can’t just preach about the long term and what people want to achieve by the end of the Wellville project while they are busy responding to the short term. Instead, we tried a different question: How can we build a better long-term future even as we address current needs?